Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform

نویسندگان

  • Shaun Treweek
  • Doug G. Altman
  • Peter Bower
  • Marion Campbell
  • Iain Chalmers
  • Seonaidh Cotton
  • Peter Craig
  • David Crosby
  • Peter Davidson
  • Declan Devane
  • Lelia Duley
  • Janet Dunn
  • Diana Elbourne
  • Barbara Farrell
  • Carrol Gamble
  • Katie Gillies
  • Kerry Hood
  • Trudie Lang
  • Roberta Littleford
  • Kirsty Loudon
  • Alison McDonald
  • Gladys McPherson
  • Annmarie Nelson
  • John Norrie
  • Craig Ramsay
  • Peter Sandercock
  • Daniel R Shanahan
  • William Summerskill
  • Matt Sydes
  • Paula Williamson
  • Mike Clarke
چکیده

Randomised trials are at the heart of evidence-based healthcare, but the methods and infrastructure for conducting these sometimes complex studies are largely evidence free. Trial Forge ( www.trialforge.org ) is an initiative that aims to increase the evidence base for trial decision making and, in doing so, to improve trial efficiency.This paper summarises a one-day workshop held in Edinburgh on 10 July 2014 to discuss Trial Forge and how to advance this initiative. We first outline the problem of inefficiency in randomised trials and go on to describe Trial Forge. We present participants' views on the processes in the life of a randomised trial that should be covered by Trial Forge.General support existed at the workshop for the Trial Forge approach to increase the evidence base for making randomised trial decisions and for improving trial efficiency. Agreed upon key processes included choosing the right research question; logistical planning for delivery, training of staff, recruitment, and retention; data management and dissemination; and close down. The process of linking to existing initiatives where possible was considered crucial. Trial Forge will not be a guideline or a checklist but a 'go to' website for research on randomised trials methods, with a linked programme of applied methodology research, coupled to an effective evidence-dissemination process. Moreover, it will support an informal network of interested trialists who meet virtually (online) and occasionally in person to build capacity and knowledge in the design and conduct of efficient randomised trials.Some of the resources invested in randomised trials are wasted because of limited evidence upon which to base many aspects of design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials. Trial Forge will help to address this lack of evidence.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Trial forge – working together to make trials more efficient

Randomised trials are at the heart of evidence-based healthcare but the methods and infrastructure used to conduct these complex studies are a largely evidencefree zone. Trial Forge (http://www.trialforge.org) is an initiative that aims to increase the evidence base for trial decision-making and in doing so, improve trial efficiency. That trials are inefficient is not in doubt. Inefficiencies a...

متن کامل

Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?

Randomised trials are a central component of all evidence-informed health care systems and the evidence coming from them helps to support health care users, health professionals and others to make more informed decisions about treatment. The evidence available to trialists to support decisions on design, conduct and reporting of randomised trials is, however, sparse. Trial Forge is an initiativ...

متن کامل

Trial forge: a systematic approach to making trials more efficient

Background Doing a trial can be a challenge but do we make it a greater challenge than it needs to be? For example, is the research question the one most relevant to patients, health professionals and policymakers? Do we really need to collect all those data? Is selecting that site a good idea and why? Do we know our retention strategies are effective and if not, why are we using them without e...

متن کامل

Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability

Randomised controlled trials are the best research design for decisions about the effect of different interventions but randomisation does not, of itself, promote the applicability of a trial's results to situations other than the precise one in which the trial was done. While methodologists and trialists have rightly paid great attention to internal validity, much less has been given to applic...

متن کامل

Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression

BACKGROUND Trials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these challenges. MAIN TEXT In this article, we report our experiences with the first completed randomi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 16  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015